Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) versus Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic): API pricing, context window, capabilities and uptime, from the same data as each model page, at the KumoAPI default channel price. Input costs 5 Credits / M for Claude Opus 5 and 2 Credits / M for Claude Sonnet 5, so Claude Sonnet 5 is 60% cheaper. Context windows are 1M and 1M.
Specs side by side
| Item | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input (prompt) · Credits / M | 5 | 2 |
| Output (completion) · Credits / M | 25 | 10 |
| Cache read · Credits / M | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| 7-day uptime | — | — |
| Latest probe latency | — | — |
| Measured throughput | — | — |
| Protocols | Anthropic Messages | Anthropic Messages |
| Sample monthly cost (10M in + 2M out) | 100 | 40 |
Prices are the KumoAPI default channel price in Credits (1 Credit = ¥1); green marks the better side. Uptime and latency come from KumoAPI probes; a dash means the model is not probed yet.
Capabilities
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Claude Sonnet 5?
At the KumoAPI default channel price, Claude Opus 5 input costs 5 Credits / M and Claude Sonnet 5 input costs 2 Credits / M, so Claude Sonnet 5 is 60% cheaper. Output and cache prices are in the specs table above.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Claude Sonnet 5?
Claude Opus 5 offers 1M tokens, Claude Sonnet 5 offers 1M tokens.
Can I switch between Claude Opus 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 at any time?
Yes. KumoAPI calls every model with the same API key; switching is just changing the model field in the request, and billing is split per model in one console.
How do the capabilities of Claude Opus 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 differ?
Their capability flags are identical. Every other capability is either supported by both or by neither; see the capability table above.
More comparisons
One API key for both Claude Opus 5 and Claude Sonnet 5
Free credits on sign-up, pay as you go, no monthly fee.